Today's Politicos vs The Words and Deeds of The Founders
Random header image... Refresh for more!
Make a blogger happy, come back. Sign up for email post alerts!
In a clinical trial buy wellbutrin online cheap in 159 severe asthmatic patients requiring..

James Madison’s Worst Nightmare

“There are again two methods of removing the causes of faction: the one, by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence; the other, by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” James Madison

Madison believed the greatest threat to democracy was factions, what we call special interests. This wasn’t a theory; it was an observation he made by studying the demise of democracies down through the ages.  If a faction, or a coalition of factions, gained control of the levers of government, then democracy would collapse on itself—usually sooner, rather than later.

To protect America from this threat, Madison and the other Framers devised a limited republic instead of a democracy. Elected officials would make laws, not the people at large. This put a buffer between unbridled passions and lawmaking. A republican form of government would help, but the true shield would be enumerated, balanced, and decentralized powers with potent checks on abuses. The Framers believed that if they could harness government powers, they would reduce the risk of tyranny. This design of the Framers worked effectively for over two hundred years.

A Much Greater Danger than Factions

As much as Madison wanted to protect the nation from factions, there was something he feared far more than factions—that was attempts to eliminate factions.

Factions cannot exist if people do not possess the freedom to form and express opinions. In the above quote, Madison was being facetious with his second method of removing factions to emphasize his point that liberty is essential to the existence of factions, and factions are a natural byproduct of a free people.

Democracies can be destroyed by factions; but eliminating the threat requires the withdrawal of the freedom to hold a contrary opinion to the public mood. It may sound like a Catch-22, but the Framers had an answer: let factions thrive, but craft a government that would be enormously difficult to capture as a prize.

Unfortunately, we have veered from the Framers’ design. If there is any restriction on federal powers, it will have to be somewhat restored with a Supreme Court decision on ObamaCare, but even if the court rules against the heath care mandate, prior decisions will remain in place that pretty much gave the government carte blanche to do whatever it wants. Constitutional checks and balances are also in tatters. It seems frighteningly possible for a group of determined activists to gain and maintain control of an unfettered national government.

As factions fight for control, they trample resistance and try to destroy factions outside their coalition. Opposing opinions are squashed. To varying degrees, all of the following intimidation techniques are being used by the progressive movement. If they succeed in suppressing alternative perspectives, Madison’s greatest fear would be realized.

  1. Marginalize and/or denigrate opposing viewpoints
  2. Cow opponents
  3. Threaten to remove opponents’ communication channels
  4. Use of political force like the IRS, Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and other executive branch departments
  5. Threaten political opponents with indictments and even prison sentences
  6. Physical force as in massive demonstration that restrict the movement and employment of opponents
  7. Political correctness
  8. Hate Crimes

To some, political correctness and hate crimes may not seem ominous, but they punish thought rather than actions. Progressives bawl that it’s cruel and unusual to overly punish actions, but revel in tacking on an additional five years for bad thinking when a criminal pulls the trigger.

It will no longer be America when common citizens are afraid to voice their opinions. How do ordinary people combat oppressive actions? By speaking up. Now, while we still have an opportunity. Our President told his progressive partisans to “Argue with neighbors, get in their face.”

If we are going to put this nation back on the track of the Founders, then we can’t be cowed by screeching neighbors. Don’t let anyone dismiss your views. Remain polite, but firm. It will take courage, but America remains the land of the free and the home of the brave.

James D. Best is the author of the Steve Dancy Tales and Tempest at Dawn, a novel about the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Look for his new book, Principled Action, Lessons from the Origins of the American Republic.


1 Marcia { 03.26.12 at 12:55 pm }

Excellent post, Jim. Today’s news that an open microphone revealed President Barack Obama telling Russian President Dmitry Medvedev that he will have greater flexibility “after my election” (regarding Russian objections to a planned U.S. missile defense shield in Europe) ought to give everyone pause. It is further indication that on everything from national security to domestic issues another 4 years of this president would irrevocably damage this nation.


2 Steve Anderson { 02.14.16 at 9:14 am }

Accept that Madison’s “greatest fear” is exactly what he wanted and your position with regard to all of this is demonstrative of it’s effectiveness. The Framer’s solution to the problems associated with factions is a slow moving muddled mess possible to reverse.


Leave a Comment