John Hancock – What Would The Founders Think? http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com Today's Politicos vs The Words and Deeds of The Founders Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:08:51 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.17 John Hancock’s Speech http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/john-hancocks-speech http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/john-hancocks-speech#respond Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:45:03 +0000 http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/?p=844 The speech below was delivered by John Hancock on the 4th anniversary of the Boston Massacre.  Clearly, by 1774, the gloves were off.  To those who heard or read the speech, Hancock’s position was no longer ambiguous.  It’s a pretty good piece of political rhetoric, eulogizing those in the slain mob as “guiltless.”  However, there are also some interesting warnings against valuing luxury and comfort over freedom.

puzzle-solver
If you have a problem with the flash working for you, you may wish to use the static version.If you succeed in doing the puzzle, we’ve implemented a way for you to get credit for your efforts! (see the box on left)

John Hancock Speech in Boston, Massachusetts
On the anniversary of the Boston Massacre of 1770.

5 March 1774

John HancockMen, Brethren, Fathers, and Fellow-Countrymen:

The attentive gravity; the venerable appearance of this crowded audience; the dignity which I behold in the countenances of so many in this great assembly; the solemnity of the occasion upon which we have met together, joined to a consideration of the part I am to take in the important business of this day, fill me with an awe hitherto unknown, and heighten the sense which I have ever had of my unworthiness to fill this sacred desk. But, allured by the call of some of my respected fellow-citizens, with whose request it is always my greatest pleasure to comply, I almost forgot my want of ability to perform what they required. In this situation I find my only support in assuring myself that a generous people will not severely censure what they know was well intended, though its want of merit should prevent their being able to applaud it. And I pray that my sincere attachment to the interest of my country, and the hearty detestation of every design formed against her liberties, may be admitted as some apology for my appearance in this place.

I have always, from my earliest youth, rejoiced in the felicity of my fellow-men; and have ever considered it as the indispensable able duty of every member of society to promote, as far as in him lies, the prosperity of every individual, but more especially of the community to which he belongs; and also, as a faithful subject of the State, to use his utmost endeavors to detect, and having detected, strenuously to oppose every traitorous plot which its enemies may devise for its destruction. Security to the persons and properties of the governed is so obviously the design and end of civil government, that to attempt a logical proof of it would be like burning tapers at noonday, to assist the sun in enlightening the world; and it cannot be either virtuous or honorable to attempt to support a government of which this is not the great and principal basis; and it is to the last degree vicious and infamous to attempt to support a government which manifestly tends to render the persons and properties of the governed insecure. Some boast of being friends to government; I am a friend to righteous government, to a government founded upon the principles of reason and justice; but I glory in publicly avowing my eternal enmity to tyranny. Is the present system, which the British administration have adopted for the government of the Colonies, a righteous government – or is it tyranny? Here suffer me to ask (and would to heaven there could be an answer!) what tenderness, what regard, respect, or consideration has Great Britain shown, in their late transactions, for the security of the persons or properties of the inhabitants of the Colonies? Or rather what have they omitted doing to destroy that security? They have declared that they have ever had, and of right ought ever to have, full power to make laws of sufficient validity to bind the Colonies in all cases whatever. They have exercised this pretended right by imposing a tax upon us without our consent; and lest we should show some reluctance at parting with our property, her fleets and armies are sent to enforce their mad pretensions. The town of Boston, ever faithful to the British Crown, has been invested by a British fleet; the troops of George III. have crossed the wide Atlantic, not to engage an enemy, but to assist a band of traitors in trampling on the rights and liberties of his most loyal subjects in America – those rights and liberties which, as a father, he ought ever to regard, and as a king, he is bound, in honor, to defend from violation, even at the risk of his own life.

Let not the history of the illustrious house of Brunswick inform posterity that a king, descended from that glorious monarch George II., once sent his British subjects to conquer and enslave his subjects in America. But be perpetual infamy entailed upon that villain who dared to advise his master to such execrable measures; for it was easy to foresee the consequences which so naturally followed upon sending troops into America to enforce obedience to acts of the British Parliament, which neither God nor man ever empowered them to make. It was reasonable to expect that troops, who knew the errand they were sent upon, would treat the people whom they were to subjugate, with a cruelty and haughtiness which too often buries the honorable character of a soldier in the disgraceful name of an unfeeling ruffian. The troops, upon their first arrival, took possession of our Senate House, and pointed their cannon against the judgment hall, and even continued them there whilst the supreme court of judicature for this province was actually sitting to decide upon the lives and fortunes of the King’s subjects. Our streets nightly resounded with the noise of riot and debauchery; our peaceful citizens were hourly exposed to shameful insults, and often felt the effects of their violence and outrage. But this was not all: as though they thought it not enough to violate our civil rights, they endeavored to deprive us of the enjoyment of our religious privileges, to vitiate our morals, and thereby render us deserving of destruction. Hence, the rude din of arms which broke in upon your solemn devotions in your temples, on that day hallowed by heaven, and set apart by God himself for his peculiar worship. Hence, impious oaths and blasphemies so often tortured your unaccustomed ear. Hence, all the arts which idleness and luxury could invent were used to betray our youth of one sex into extravagance and effeminacy, and of the other to infamy and ruin; and did they not succeed but too well? Did not a reverence for religion sensibly decay? Did not our infants almost learn to lisp out curses before they knew their horrid import? Did not our youth forget they were Americans, and, regardless of the admonitions of the wise and aged, servilely copy from their tyrants those vices which finally must overthrow the empire of Great Britain? And must I be compelled to acknowledge knowledge that even the noblest, fairest, part of all the lower creation did not entirely escape the cursed snare? When virtue has once erected her throne within the female breast, it is upon so solid a basis that nothing is able to expel the heavenly inhabitant. But have there not been some few, indeed, I hope, whose youth and inexperience have rendered them a prey to wretches, whom, upon the least reflection, they would have despised and hated as foes to God and their country? I fear there have been some such unhappy instances, or why have I seen an honest father clothed with shame; or why a virtuous mother drowned in tears?

But I forbear, and come reluctantly to the transactions of that dismal night, when in such quick succession we felt the extremes of grief, astonishment, and rage; when heaven in anger, for a dreadful moment, suffered hell to take the reins; when Satan, with his chosen band, opened the sluices of New England’s blood, and sacrilegiously polluted our land with the dead bodies of her guiltless sons! Let this sad tale of death never be told without a tear; let not the heaving bosom cease to burn with a manly indignation at the barbarous story, through the long tracts of future time; let every parent tell the shameful story to his listening children until tears of pity glisten in their eyes, and boiling passions shake their tender frames; and whilst the anniversary of that ill-fated night is kept a jubilee in the grim court of pandemonium, let all America join in one common prayer to heaven that the inhuman, unprovoked murders of the fifth of March, 1770, planned by Hillsborough, and a knot of treacherous knaves in Boston, and executed by the cruel hand of Preston and his sanguinary coadjutors, may ever stand in history without a parallel. But what, my countrymen, withheld the ready arm of vengeance from executing instant justice on the vile assassins? Perhaps you feared promiscuous carnage might ensue, and that the innocent might share the fate of those who had performed the infernal deed. But were not all guilty? Were you not too tender of the lives of those who came to fix a yoke on your necks? But I must not too severely blame a fault, which great souls only can commit. May that magnificence of spirit which scorns the low pursuits of malice, may that generous compassion which often preserves from ruin, even a guilty villain, forever actuate the noble bosoms of Americans! But let not the miscreant host vainly imagine that we feared their arms. No; them we despised; we dread nothing but slavery. Death is the creature of a poltroon’s brains; ’tis immortality to sacrifice ourselves for the salvation of our country. We fear not death. That gloomy night, the pale-faced moon, and the affrighted stars that hurried through the sky, can witness that we fear not death. Our hearts which, at the recollection, glow with rage that four revolving years have scarcely taught us to restrain, can witness that we fear not death; and happy it is for those who dared to insult us, that their naked bones are not now piled up an everlasting lasting monument of Massachusetts’ bravery. But they retired, they fled, and in that flight they found their only safety. We then expected that the hand of public justice would soon inflict that punishment upon the murderers, which, by the laws of God and man, they had incurred. But let the unbiased pen of a Robertson, or perhaps of some equally famed American, conduct this trial before the great tribunal of succeeding generations. And though the murderers may escape the just resentment of an enraged people; though drowsy justice, intoxicated by the poisonous draught prepared for her cup, still nods upon her rotten seat, yet be assured such complicated crimes will meet their due reward. Tell me, ye bloody butchers! ye villains high and low! ye wretches who contrived, as well as you who executed the inhuman deed! do you not feel the goads and stings of conscious guilt pierce through your savage bosoms? Though some of you may think yourselves exalted to a height that bids defiance to human justice, and others shroud yourselves beneath the mask of hypocrisy, and build your hopes of safety on the low arts of cunning, chicanery, and falsehood, yet do you not sometimes feel the gnawings of that worm which never dies? Do not the injured shades of Maverick, Gray, Caldwell, Attucks, and Carr attend you in your solitary walks, arrest you even in the midst of your debaucheries, and fill even your dreams with terror?

Ye dark designing knaves, ye murderers, parricides! how dare you tread upon the earth which has drunk in the blood of slaughtered innocents, shed by your wicked hands? How dare you breathe that air which wafted to the ear of heaven the groans of those who fell a sacrifice to your accursed ambition? But if the laboring earth cloth not expand her jaws; if the air you breathe is not commissioned to be the minister of death; yet, hear it and tremble! The eye of heaven penetrates the darkest chambers of the soul, traces the leading clue through all the labyrinths which your industrious folly has devised; and you, however you may have screened yourselves from human eyes, must be arraigned, must lift your hands, red with the blood of those whose death you have procured, at the tremendous bar of God!

But I gladly quit the gloomy theme of death, and leave you to improve the thought of that important day when our naked souls must stand before that Being from whom nothing can be hid. I would not dwell too long upon the horrid effects which have already followed from quartering regular troops in this town. Let our misfortunes teach posterity to guard against such evils for the future. Standing armies are sometimes (I would by no means say generally, much less universally) composed of persons who have rendered themselves unfit to live in civil society; who have no other motives of conduct than those which a desire of the present gratification of their passions suggests; who have no property in any country; men who have given up their own liberties, and envy those who enjoy liberty; who are equally indifferent to the glory of a George or a Louis; who, for the addition of one penny a day to their wages, would desert from the Christian cross and fight under the crescent of the Turkish Sultan. From such men as these, what has not a State to fear? With such as these, usurping Caesar passed the Rubicon; with such as these, he humbled mighty Rome, and forced the mistress of the world to own a master in a traitor. These are the men whom sceptred robbers now employ to frustrate the designs of God, and render vain the bounties which his gracious hand pours indiscriminately upon his creatures. By these the miserable slaves in Turkey, Persia, and many other extensive countries, are rendered truly wretched, though their air is salubrious, and their soil luxuriously fertile. By these, France and Spain, though blessed by nature with all that administers to the convenience of life, have been reduced to that contemptible state in which they now appear; and by these, Britain, – but if I were possessed of the gift of prophesy, I dare not, except by divine command, unfold the leaves on which the destiny of that once powerful kingdom is inscribed.

Caesar Crossing Rubicon

But since standing armies are so hurtful to a State, perhaps my countrymen may demand some substitute, some other means of rendering us secure against the incursions of a foreign enemy. But can you be one moment at a loss? Will not a well-disciplined militia afford you ample security against foreign foes? We want not courage; it is discipline alone in which we are exceeded by the most formidable troops that ever trod the earth. Surely our hearts flutter no more at the sound of war than did those of the immortal band of Persia, the Macedonian phalanx, the invincible Roman legions, the Turkish janissaries, the gens d’armes of France, or the well-known grenadiers of Britain. A well-disciplined militia is a safe, an honorable guard to a community like this, whose inhabitants are by nature brave, and are laudably tenacious of that freedom in which they were born. From a well-regulated militia we have nothing to fear; their interest is the same with that of the State. When a country is invaded, the militia are ready to appear in its defense; they march into the field with that fortitude which a consciousness of the justice of their cause inspires; they do not jeopard their lives for a master who considers them only as the instruments of his ambition, and whom they regard only as the daily dispenser of the scanty pittance of bread and water. No; they fight for their houses, their lands, for their wives, their children; for all who claim the tenderest names, and are held dearest in their hearts; they fight pro aris et focis, for their liberty, and for themselves, and for their God. And let it not offend if I say that no militia ever appeared in more flourishing condition than that of this province now cloth; and pardon me if I say, of this town in particular. I mean not to boast; I would not excite envy, but manly emulation. We have all one common cause; let it, therefore, be our only contest, who shall most contribute to the security of the liberties of America. And may the same kind Providence which has watched over this country from her infant state still enable us to defeat our enemies! I cannot here forbear noticing the signal manner in which the designs of those who wish not well to us have been discovered. The dark deeds of a treacherous cabal have been brought to public view. You now know the serpents who, whilst cherished in your bosoms, were darting the envenomed stings into the vitals of the constitution. But the representatives of the people have fixed a mark on these ungrateful monsters, which, though it may not make them so secure as Cain of old, yet renders them, at least, as infamous. Indeed, it would be effrontive to the tutelar deity of this country even to despair of saving it from all the snares which human policy can lay.

Surely you never will tamely suffer this country to be a den of thieves. Remember, my friends, from whom you sprang. Let not a meanness of spirit, unknown to those whom you boast of as your fathers, excite a thought to the dishonor of your mothers I conjure you, by all that is dear, by all that is honorable, by all that is sacred, not only that ye pray, but that ye act; that, if necessary, ye fight, and even die, for the prosperity of our Jerusalem. Break in sunder, with noble disdain, the bonds with which the Philistines have bound you. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed, by the soft arts of luxury and effeminacy, into the pit digged for your destruction. Despise the glare of wealth. That people who pay greater respect to a wealthy villain than to an honest, upright man in poverty, almost deserve to be enslaved; they plainly show that wealth, however it may be acquired, is, in their esteem, to be preferred to virtue.

But I thank God that America abounds in men who are superior to all temptation, whom nothing can divert from a steady pursuit of the interest of their country, who are at once its ornament and safeguard. And sure I am, I should not incur your displeasure, if I paid a respect, so justly due to their much-honored characters, in this place. But when I name an Adams, such a numerous host of fellow-patriots rush upon my mind, that I fear it would take up too much of your time, should I attempt to call over the illustrious roll. But your grateful hearts will point you to the men; and their revered names, in all succeeding times, shall grace the annals of America. From them let us, my friends, take example; from them let us catch the divine enthusiasm; and feel, each for himself, the godlike pleasure of diffusing happiness on all around us; of delivering the oppressed from the iron grasp of tyranny; of changing the hoarse complaints and bitter moans of wretched slaves into those cheerful songs, which freedom and contentment must inspire. There is a heartfelt satisfaction in reflecting on our exertions for the public weal, which all the sufferings an enraged tyrant can inflict will never take away; which the ingratitude and reproaches of those whom we have saved from ruin cannot rob us of. The virtuous asserter of the rights of mankind merits a reward, which even a want of success in his endeavors to save his country, the heaviest misfortune which can befall a genuine patriot, cannot entirely prevent him from receiving.

I have the most animating confidence that the present noble struggle for liberty will terminate gloriously for America. And let us play the man for our God, and for the cities of our God; while we are using the means in our power, let us humbly commit our righteous cause to the great Lord of the Universe, who loveth righteousness and hateth iniquity. And having secured the approbation of our hearts, by a faithful and unwearied discharge of our duty to our country, let us joyfully leave our concerns in the hands of him who raiseth up and pulleth down the empires and kingdoms of the world as he pleases; and with cheerful submission to his sovereign will, devoutly say: “Although the fig tree shall not blossom, neither shall fruit be in the vines; the labor of the olive shall fail, and the field shall yield no meat; the flock shall be cut off from the fold, and there shall be no herd in the stalls; yet we will rejoice in the Lord, we will joy in the God of our salvation.”

]]>
http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/john-hancocks-speech/feed 0
American Tempest: How The Boston Tea Party Sparked A Revolution by Harlow Giles Unger http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/american-tempest-how-the-boston-tea-party-sparked-a-revolution-by-harlow-giles-unger http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/american-tempest-how-the-boston-tea-party-sparked-a-revolution-by-harlow-giles-unger#comments Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:04:52 +0000 http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/?p=568

American TempestHarlow Giles Unger has written another fascinating book.  American Tempest, How The Boston Tea Party Sparked A Revolution is his latest in a series of really good biographies.  While it is true that American Tempest is not a biography in the sense that Patrick Henry, Lion of Liberty and James Monroe, The Last Founding Father are, it is a biography of sorts – of  the first Tea Party Patriots.  American Tempest might have been written about  John Hancock and Samuel Adams, given the volume of interesting information about these enigmatic patriots.

The picture of Samuel Adams that emerges from American Tempest is considerably less flattering than that drawn by Ira Stoll, whose biography of Adams was one of the first reviewed at WWTFT.  Re-reading that review, it becomes obvious that it is difficult to come up with a true picture of any biographer’s subject based on one book, regardless how good it may be.  It would be interesting to hear a debate between between these two authors, both of whom wrote interesting and informative books.

In the Stoll biography, Adams is portrayed with an emphasis on the results of his actions, a willingness to believe his protestations of innocence, and perhaps a tinge of hero worship.  The view from American Tempest delves a bit deeper into Adam’s darker side.  The authors are much closer in their respective portrayals of John Hancock. While Unger pulls no punches in his depiction of Hancock as a bit of an opportunist, he also gives him his due as a true patriot.  Ironically, in Stoll’s book Hancock’s faults are emphasized almost to the exclusion of his accomplishments.

John HancockJohn Hancock was a wealthy merchant who alternately funded and distanced himself from the rabble that Adams mustered in Boston.  Initially, Hancock wanted to hedge his bets.  He tried to remain in both the patriot and loyalist camps simultaneously but was ultimately drawn  solidly into the rebel camp by the machinations of Samuel Adams.  However, although for a time Adams used the wealthy Hancock as his “milch cow” for funding many of his activities and underwriting his living expenses, he got more than he bargained for when he roped Hancock in once and for all.  Hancock assumed leadership of the rebels and turned them into patriots, leaving Adams far behind in influence and power.

Once Hancock was in, he was in wholeheartedly.  Hancock had remained in Boston for the First Continental Congress, but acceded to demands that he attend the Second Continental Congress.  Unger points out:

... Hancock, more than anyone else there, had made enormous sacrifices for the Patriot cause and deserved public acclaim.  He had lost his sloop Liberty, spent at least £100,000 of his own money on arms and ammunition, and risked the rest of his fortune on the success of the revolution.  If arrested on the king’s warrant, he faced trial on charges of treason, with the possible loss of both his honor and his life.

It was Adams, on the other hand, perhaps more than anyone else in Boston, who lit the flame of revolution.  He was a magician with propaganda and publicity and used Hancock’s money to build relationships with the disenfranchised.  Unger offers this sketch of Adams and his activities with James Otis Jr. another Tea Party Patriot:

Sam Adams’s parents died in 1758, and although young Sam — by then thirty-six — inherited the brewery and the family’s fine home on Purchase Street, he ran the brewery into bankruptcy and allowed the house to deteriorate.  Evidently unconcerned with earning money, he married, fathered two children, and, after his wife’s death, raised his children in abject poverty.  Friends of his father found him a sinecure as a city tax collector to ensure his earning enough to feed his children and his slave, but within a short time, his ledgers showed a shortage of £8,000, representing tax monies he had either failed to collect or had embezzled.

Initially repelled by Adams’s person, Otis only embraced his fellow Harvard alumnus after discovering Adams’s skilled pen and his connections with a huge, disenfranchised and underpaid population of shipfitters, rope makers, sail makers, caulkers, sailors, clerks and longshoremen who worked Boston’s waterfront.  The waterfront workers would soon prove a natural and powerful constituency as foot soldiers for Sam Adams’s political movement.  Although Adams abstained from alcohol, he spent evenings roaming the city’s taverns, where, according to his distant cousin John Adams, patrons “smoke tobacco till you cannot see from one to the other.  They they drip flip1 I suppose, and there they choose … selectmen, assessors, collectors, wardens, fire-wardens, an representatives.”  Sam Adams patrolled the taverns to make certain that they chose the men he wanted them to choose and ensure his own ambitions for political power.

Samuel AdamsAs Unger takes the reader through the events leading up to the actual “Tea Party” in Boston Harbor he paints a picture of a somewhat spoiled populace, who perhaps, had they been able to see things from a larger perspective, might have realized  their good fortune in living in America, where they enjoyed a standard of living and freedoms unknown to most Englishmen.  The back story on Samuel Adams and James Otis is one of jealousy and grudges against the establishment for perceived and real slights to their families and reputations.   According to Unger, these men were at least partially motivated by personal grudges against the establishment.

On the other hand, Unger points out the stupidity of the British actions which fomented some minor squabbles in one colony into a full-scale rebellion in all the colonies.  By painting with too broad a brush, the British ended up uniting the colonies against the mother country.

American Tempest chronicles the rise and decline of the Tea Party Patriots in Boston.  It was Hancock who transformed the mob into patriots by eschewing and denouncing the violence.   The change is an interesting one, because it ensured their demise as a political force.  Hancock instilled discipline and order — things antithetical to a mob, and in so doing severely undermined the influence wielded by Sam Adams.   While the latter faded from prominence during the revolution, Hancock became the country’s first president of the United States – under the Articles of Confederation.

As with any book of consequence, it is difficult to write a review for fear of  leaving something critical out.  American Tempest certainly qualifies as a book of consequence.  It is informative and thought provoking, packed with historical footnotes and research.  Unger points out in the introduction that: “Ironically, few, if any, Americans today — even those who call themselves Tea Party Patriots — know the true and entire story of the original Tea Party and Patriots who staged it.”  He’s right, and while this review does little to correct that, reading his book will.

1A mixture of beer and spirit sweetened with sugar and heated with a hot iron. — The Shorter Oxford Dictionary.

]]>
http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/american-tempest-how-the-boston-tea-party-sparked-a-revolution-by-harlow-giles-unger/feed 3
Recapturing the Tea Party http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/recapturing-the-tea-party http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/recapturing-the-tea-party#comments Tue, 08 Feb 2011 13:19:45 +0000 http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/?p=585 Boston Tea PartyContrary to popular opinion, the Boston Tea party was more than a protest over taxes. Taxes were a big element, but it was also a protest against a Parliament that wouldn’t listen, denied the colonists representation, and tried to control trade throughout the empire. It took many years of corrosive exchanges between the American colonies and England to ignite the Boston Tea Party.

The Boston Tea Party was not a prank perpetuated by a few rowdies dressed as Native Americans. On December 16, 1773, as many as 7,000 people congregated around the Old South Meeting House.  Hundreds crowded into the church to hear partisan speeches, but most of the protesters spilled out onto the streets.  Legend has it Sam Adams gave a signal to send 200 colonists—a few dressed as Native Americans—marching in columns down to the docks. As they approached, the protestors split into equally sized groups to board the three tea-carrying ships. Within three hours, the Tea Partiers broke open 342 chests and threw the tea into the sea.

The Sons of Liberty organized the protest.  For the most part, the Sons of Liberty was comprised of merchants, tradesmen, farmers, and the professionally self-employed.  Americans were used to limited government, and with the truly free markets in the New World, many, if not most, had built a prosperous life.  They had engaged in trade within the colonies, but Parliament had severely restricted their trade with the rest of the world. They despised control of their livelihood, which included the tea monopoly given to the East India Company by Parliament.

The Boston Tea Party was a deliberate act by ordinary citizens who would be remembered for their extraordinary courage and conviction.  Beyond the tax, it was a revolt against the philosophy of mercantilism that lay behind the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767.  Mercantilism assumed the world economy was a zero-sum game, but Adam Smith, in Wealth of Nations proposed a new economic theory that said the capitalism and free markets grew wealth for all.  The colonists had a perfect example right before them.  Starting from scratch, commerce and prosperity thrived to the point where most Americans were literate, well-fed, and optimistic about their future.  In fact, Philadelphia had grown to be the second largest English speaking city in the world.

Back in England, Parliament reacted predictably.  First, members ridiculed and belittled the protesters.  Then they punished the colonies by passing the Intolerable Acts which, among other things, closed Boston Harbor.  For all the rage against the colonists, no one in London seemed to notice the mounting emotion, growing size, or broad-based leadership of the movement.

The modern Tea Party movement has many similarities with its namesake.  More than two centuries later, on April 15, 2009, reborn Tea Parties assembled throughout the United States, to protest a government which was unresponsive.  Like the original Boston Tea Party, today’s incarnation exploded from grassroots discontent; leadership is dispersed; and affiliated organizations spread out across the nation so fast it startled seasoned politicos.  The Tea Party deserves a lot of credit for raising awareness about excessive government spending, the national debt, and the encroachment of the national government on more and more aspects of the economy and daily lives of Americans.

The discontent that set off the Boston Tea Party eventually led to rebellion.  Tea Partiers engage in peaceful demonstrations because, unlike 1773, they have representation.  Not only were the colonists unrepresented in Parliament, the king appointed the top executive in most of the colonies.  Today, the Tea Party wields a potent ballot box to make their voice heard.

Congress may not have fully grasped the message from voters and activists, but as the movement refuses to abate, they are listening better every day. When people get dissatisfied enough to leave their home, those in power need to heed their concerns.

James D. Best is the author of Tempest at Dawn, a novel about the 1787 Constitutional Convention.

]]>
http://www.whatwouldthefoundersthink.com/recapturing-the-tea-party/feed 4